Skip to main content

F35 to buy or not to buy

Canada is in the process of replacing its aging CF18 (already 30 years old) fighter aircraft.  Canada is a both a small and a large country, its geography is large, but its 36 million population is small.  The decision to replace the aging CF18 has been long and arduous, and the Department of Defense has finally settled on the F35 strike aircraft, currently being tested and readied for deployment (2016) in the US Air Force.

So far the DoD has indicated that the aircraft should cost about $75 million a piece and we are looking to buy 65 – for a total of nearly $5 billion.  On top of that the DoD has budgeted for the aircraft consumable and training facilities – basically another $4 billion. For a grand total of $9 billion. 

Those who want to buy the aircraft maintain that it was specifically created as a replacement for the F18 aircraft (the American version of the CF18), and therefore an excellent and affordable aircraft for the Canadian armed forces.  It also a dual mission aircraft, it is both a fighter and a bomber.  As those involved indicated, when the CF18 was bought it was purchased in the cold war environment where our enemies would be flying over the Pole!  The aircraft will be used by the US army, which means that in war theater Canadians (who often work in concert with the Americans) will have access to spare parts….

Those who are against the purchase have three principal issues:  First, the aircraft is not yet “operating”, it has been flying for a year but is still in the test phase.  So the final cost of the aircraft is unknown.  However, the cost per aircraft will not be $75 million, but nearly twice that $145 million per aircraft.  Which means that the total program cost is not $9 billion but nearer to $16 billion.

Second, although it is a replacement aircraft for the F18, it has two major flaws – it’s a compromise aircraft, as a fighter and a bomber it is great at neither.  Third, two key features are missing, long range and super cruse.  Canada is a big country and military aircrafts are the F1 of the air, they consume lots of gas, and have limited range.  Moreover, if the aircraft doesn’t have super cruise it must use its afterburners – great speed, but range drops off dramatically.

The first and second arguments are the poorest, firstly, the numbers given by the DoD are preliminary, Canada will not embark on this adventure until it knows the final number.  In fact, the aircraft may indeed cost $16 billion but that’s not a reason for not buying them.  One aspect that is somewhat strange in the cost calculation: Wikipedia shows the estimated flyaway cost of the aircraft (in all its versions) at $140-$150 million per aircraft (that the DoD talks about $75 million per aircraft seems to be an exercise in deception on their part).  Those who say that we should not buy fighter jets misunderstand the discussion.  If Canada is to have borders (especially in the North) it must enforce its sovereign rights.  Fighter aircrafts are a wonderful force projection tool.  The second argument that the aircraft is bad at its two missions is valid but irrelevant; Canada cannot afford to have both a fighter and a bomber.  It needs a fighter for force projection, and it needs a bomber for flight interdiction missions (e.g. Libya).  Canada needs a multi-mission aircraft. 

The one aspect that is troubling is the last one, specifically; Canada’s primary use for the aircraft is force projection.  Most of this will take place over the high artic – very far from bases, so the aircraft need long range operation capability (unless the DoD is also planning to buy a bunch of refueling aircraft).  Finally, the F35 is a single engine aircraft.  That’s a bit of a problem when flying in the artic. 

In terms of competitors to the F35 there is the F22 and the European Typhoon.  The F22 cannot be exported.  The Eurofighter Typhoon is also a twin engine super cruse high range aircraft, but by 2020 (when we are looking to replace the CF18) it will be an old program.  There are good arguments why the Typhoon is not appropriate, because by the time Canada is ready to replace the CF18 (around 2020) the aircraft will already be “old” at 17, and nearing the end of its production schedule.  Maybe the DoD bought the only “available” modern Fighter aircraft available!

Anyway these are the facts 

Popular posts from this blog

Ok so I lied...a little (revised)

When we began looking at farming in 2013/14 as something we both wanted to do as a "second career" we invested time and money to understand what sector of farming was profitable.  A few things emerged, First, high-quality, source-proven, organic farm products consistently have much higher profit margins.  Secondly, transformation accounted for nearly 80% of total profits, and production and distribution accounted for 20% of profits: Farmers and retailers have low profit margins and the middle bits make all the money. A profitable farm operation needs to be involved in the transformation of its produce.  The low-hanging fruits: cheese and butter.  Milk, generates a profit margin of 5% to 8%, depending on milk quality.  Transformed into cheese and butter, and the profit margin rises to 40% (Taking into account all costs).  Second:  20% of a steer carcass is ground beef quality.  The price is low, because (a) a high percentage of the carcass, and (b) ground beef requires process
Post a Comment
Read more

21st century milk parlour

When we first looked at building our farm in 2018, we made a few money-saving decisions, the most important is that we purchased our milk herd from a retiring farmer and we also purchased his milking parlour equipment.  It was the right decision at the time.  The equipment dates from around 2004/05 and was perfectly serviceable, our installers replaced some tubing but otherwise, the milking parlour was in good shape.  It is a mature technology. Now, we are building a brand new milk parlour because our milking cows are moving from the old farm to the new farm.  So we are looking at brand new equipment this time because, after 20 years of daily service, the old cattle parlour's systems need to be replaced.  Fear not it will not be destroyed instead good chunks will end up on Facebook's marketplace and be sold to other farmers for spare parts or expansion of their current systems. All our cattle are chipped, nothing unusual there, we have sensors throughout the farm, and our milki
Post a Comment
Read more

So we sold surplus electricity one time last summer...(Update)

I guess that we will be buying an additional tank for our methane after all.   Over the past few months, we've had several electricity utilities/distributors which operate in our region come to the farm to "inspect our power plant facilities, to ensure they conform to their requirements".  This is entirely my fault.  Last summer we were accumulating too much methane for our tankage capacity, and so instead of selling the excess gas, that would have cost us some money, we (and I mean me) decided to produce excess electricity and sell it to the grid.  Because of all the rules and regulations, we had to specify our overall capacity and timing for the sale of electricity (our capacity is almost 200 Kw) which is a lot but more importantly, it's available 24/7, because it's gas powered.  It should be noted that the two generators are large because we burn methane and smaller generators are difficult to adapt to burn unconventional gas, plus they are advanced and can &qu
Post a Comment
Read more